🔗 Share this article

As a game master, I traditionally avoided significant use of chance during my tabletop roleplaying games. I preferred was for story direction and what happened in a game to be shaped by player choice as opposed to random chance. However, I opted to change my approach, and I'm truly happy with the result.

The Catalyst: Watching 'Luck Rolls'

A well-known actual-play show showcases a DM who often asks for "chance rolls" from the participants. The process entails selecting a type of die and defining consequences contingent on the roll. It's essentially no distinct from consulting a random table, these are created in the moment when a course of events lacks a obvious conclusion.

I opted to test this method at my own table, mostly because it looked engaging and presented a change from my standard routine. The results were fantastic, prompting me to reflect on the often-debated dynamic between pre-determination and improvisation in a roleplaying game.

A Powerful Session Moment

In a recent session, my group had survived a large-scale fight. Afterwards, a player inquired after two friendly NPCs—a sibling duo—had made it. Rather than deciding myself, I let the dice decide. I instructed the player to roll a d20. The possible results were: a low roll, both would perish; on a 5-9, a single one succumbed; a high roll, they both lived.

Fate decreed a 4. This led to a deeply poignant scene where the adventurers found the bodies of their friends, forever holding hands in death. The group performed last rites, which was uniquely significant due to previous story developments. As a final touch, I improvised that the remains were suddenly restored, containing a enchanted item. I rolled for, the item's contained spell was perfectly what the group required to resolve another critical situation. You simply script such perfect coincidences.

Improving On-the-Spot Skills

This event made me wonder if chance and thinking on your feet are in fact the core of D&D. Although you are a meticulously planning DM, your skill to pivot may atrophy. Groups frequently take delight in derailing the most detailed plans. Therefore, a skilled DM must be able to adapt swiftly and invent scenarios in real-time.

Employing on-the-spot randomization is a excellent way to train these skills without going completely outside your comfort zone. The trick is to use them for small-scale decisions that don't fundamentally change the overarching story. For instance, I would avoid using it to establish if the central plot figure is a traitor. But, I might use it to figure out if the characters reach a location moments before a major incident unfolds.

Empowering Player Agency

Luck rolls also serves to keep players engaged and create the feeling that the story is alive, evolving in reaction to their decisions immediately. It combats the perception that they are merely pawns in a DM's sole narrative, thereby strengthening the cooperative nature of roleplaying.

This philosophy has always been embedded in the original design. Early editions were enamored with encounter generators, which made sense for a game focused on treasure hunting. Although contemporary D&D frequently prioritizes story and character, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, it's not necessarily the best approach.

Finding the Right Balance

There is absolutely no issue with thorough preparation. However, equally valid no problem with stepping back and letting the rolls to decide some things rather than you. Authority is a big factor in a DM's job. We need it to run the game, yet we frequently find it hard to give some up, at times when doing so could be beneficial.

A piece of suggestion is this: Have no fear of letting go of control. Experiment with a little randomness for smaller outcomes. You might just create that the unexpected outcome is infinitely more memorable than anything you would have scripted in advance.